As someone who spent years developing my own artistic voice through real practice and struggle, it stings to watch a prompt typed in seconds get treated as equally deserving of ownership and protection as work born from actual human creative effort.
The US Copyright Office's 2023 guidance explicitly denies copyright to purely AI-generated output specifically because existing law requires a human author, and courts have upheld this in cases like Thaler v. Perlmutter -- current law already answers this clearly, no eligibility yet exists.
Should AI companies be required to open-source their large language models?
Is caste-based reservation system still necessary in modern India?
