Feels like if the outcome genuinely helps way more people than it hurts, it's probably worth it even if the method wasn't perfectly clean.
Feels like if the outcome genuinely helps way more people than it hurts, it's probably worth it even if the method wasn't perfectly clean.
I think about every atrocity in history justified in the name of some greater good, and it makes me deeply uneasy trusting that logic -- the means are usually the only thing anyone can actually be held accountable for in the moment.
Should individual liberty always come before the collective good?
Is caste-based reservation system still necessary in modern India?